The organization of the trans Atlantic and transit saharan trade

Explore the distinct organizational structures of the trans-Atlantic and trans-Saharan trade routes, highlighting their geographical and cultural influences.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The organization of the trans-Atlantic and trans-Saharan trade was structured differently due to the geographical and cultural contexts in which they took place.

The trans-Saharan trade involved the exchange of goods across the Sahara Desert between the peoples of North Africa (Berbers and Tuaregs) and the people of Western Sudan. This trade was facilitated by organized caravan routes and relied heavily on camel transportation. Traders would travel in large caravans, which provided security and protection against the harsh desert conditions. Middlemen, who coordinated the trade, received trade goods, camels, and horses from rich North African traders. These middlemen would then contact desert guides known as takshifs, who acted as interpreters and provided additional security. The Tuaregs also played a role in guarding the oases and ensuring the safety of the traders. The trans-Saharan trade was primarily driven by the demand for West African goods such as gold, slaves, and kola nuts by the North Africans, and for North African goods like horses, cotton cloth, and weapons by the people of Western Sudan.

On the other hand, the trans-Atlantic trade involved the exchange of goods between Europe, Africa, and the Americas, earning it the name Triangular trade. This trade was heavily influenced by the technological innovations of sea transport, particularly by Spain and Portugal. The trans-Atlantic trade was driven by European interests in expanding overseas, such as finding a sea route to India and the Far East, acquiring gold, and obtaining valuable commodities like spices. The trade predominantly involved the transport of slaves from Africa to the Americas, where they were forced into labor on plantations. European traders would bring manufactured goods, such as textiles and weapons, to Africa, which were then exchanged for slaves. The enslaved Africans were transported across the Atlantic in horrific conditions known as the Middle Passage. This trade route became highly profitable for European countries and played a significant role in the development of the Americas.

In summary, the organization of the trans-Saharan trade relied on camel caravans, middlemen, desert guides, and the protection of oases, while the trans-Atlantic trade was facilitated by sea transport and involved the exchange of goods between Europe, Africa, and the Americas, primarily driven by the slave trade.

The organizational structures of the trans-Atlantic and trans-Saharan trade routes were shaped by several key differences influenced by geographical and cultural factors.

Firstly, the trans-Saharan trade route was primarily a land-based trade route that crossed the vast Sahara Desert. This harsh geographical feature played a significant role in shaping its organizational structure. The use of camel caravans was essential for transportation across the desert, as camels were well-suited to survive the arid conditions. The organization of the trans-Saharan trade route revolved around these caravans, with traders traveling in groups for safety, sharing resources, and providing mutual assistance. The presence of oases along the route acted as crucial stopping points for rest, water, and trade. Desert guides, known as takshifs, were instrumental in navigating the challenging terrain and acting as interpreters between different cultural groups. Additionally, the involvement of Berber and Tuareg middlemen and traders from North Africa further influenced the organizational structure of the trans-Saharan trade.

On the other hand, the trans-Atlantic trade route was predominantly a sea-based trade route that connected Europe, Africa, and the Americas. The geographical factor of the Atlantic Ocean shaped the organizational structure of this trade route. The use of ships and maritime technology allowed for larger volumes of trade and facilitated the transportation of goods and enslaved Africans across vast distances. European nations, such as Portugal and Spain, played a dominant role in organizing and controlling the trans-Atlantic trade. They established trading posts and colonies along the African coast and in the Americas to facilitate the exchange of goods. The triangular trade system emerged, with manufactured goods from Europe being traded for enslaved Africans in Africa, who were then transported to the Americas to work on plantations, producing commodities like sugar, tobacco, and cotton.

Culturally, the trans-Saharan trade route was influenced by the diverse ethnic groups and kingdoms involved. The Berbers and Tuaregs from North Africa, along with the West African kingdoms of Mali, Ghana, and Songhai, played crucial roles in the trade. These cultural factors influenced the establishment of trade networks, the development of trade routes, and the exchange of goods. In contrast, the trans-Atlantic trade route was driven by the interests of European powers and their interactions with African societies. The cultural dynamics of colonization, slavery, and the exploitation of resources greatly influenced the organizational structure of this trade route.

In conclusion, the organizational structures of the trans-Atlantic and trans-Saharan trade routes differed significantly due to geographical and cultural factors. The trans-Saharan trade relied on land-based caravans and the involvement of Berber and Tuareg traders, while the trans-Atlantic trade was dominated by sea transport and European control. The unique geographical landscapes and cultural dynamics of each region shaped the way trade was conducted and organized.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
people found this article helpful. What about you?

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x